Rocket & SoftBook devices were designed for individual, not libraries or other institutions.

Screens of the devices do not seem to cause any eye strain.  Rather, the combination of large font and backlight makes it easier on the eyes.

Library patrons are very eager to try out ebook technology-  Within 2 weeks, six-months of holds were placed on all 10 public library devices

When asked in what format (ebook or paper) the library patron would want to read his/her next book, 40% chose ebook and 15% stated no preference.

Reasons for ebook preference: backlighting large font easier to read fun

Reasons for paper book preference: tradition more durable better selection no battery less expensive

Lighter weight was the most common suggestion for how the devices could be improved.  Longer battery life came in a distant second.

When asked what they liked about reading with this technology, the most common response was the backlighting feature-- "could read in bed without a light- wonderful!" "not needing to be near a lamp" "easy to read in the car at night (on a trip)"

After 17 months of circulation, none of the 30 devices have been damaged or broken and none of the peripherals (A/C adapter, stylus, etc.) lost.

Academic library patrons would prefer a multifunctional device, instead of one dedicated solely to ebook reading. Many of them are already carrying a laptop and/or PDA and do not want to carrying around another piece of hardware.

Few appropriate titles for middle school students, high school students, university students (other than leisure reading) and foreign language students.

Many challenges to the integration of ebook readers into a library collection.

Would you prefer to make your own conclusions? If so, all of the patrons surveys are available for your own analysis.